HomeBlog › Polity GK › Sources of the Indian Constitution

Sources of the Indian Constitution — 10 Nations Global Orbit around GOI Act 1935 Blueprint, UK/US/Irish Features, and Constitutional Laboratory Synthesis INDIA 10 NATIONS ORBIT UK, US, Ireland, Canada, Oz, France, USSR, Ger, SA, Japan GOI ACT 1935 ~60% DNA Federal Scheme Judiciary & PSCs Office of Governor MASTER BLUEPRINT Government of India Act 1935 (~60% Baseline) SYNTHESIS CULTURED SYNTHESIS Global Ideas + Indian Realities (Ambedkar) CONSTITUTIONAL SOURCES: 10 NATIONS + GOI ACT 1935 RE-ENGINEERED FOR INDIA

Sources of the Indian Constitution: How 10 Nations Inspired India — Complete Guide

By RRBCONTENTS Editorial Published: 23 July 2026
Polity GK • Constitutional Law 19 min read Updated: July 23, 2026

🌍 Key Takeaways

~60% DNA
Government of India Act 1935 baseline
10 Nations
Global constitutional inspirations
60 Constitutions
Studied by Sir B.N. Rau
0 Plagiarism
Ambedkar's defense of constitutional borrowing

Table of Contents

  1. The Master Blueprint: Government of India Act, 1935
  2. 1. United Kingdom: The Parliamentary Engine
  3. 2. United States of America: Fundamental Rights & Judicial Defense
  4. 3. Ireland: The Social Conscience (DPSP)
  5. 4. Canada: Quasi-Federalism with a Strong Centre
  6. 5. Australia: Cooperative Federalism & Free Trade
  7. 6. France: The Ideals of a Democratic Republic
  8. 7. USSR (Now Russia): Civic Duty & Economic Planning
  9. 8. Weimar Germany: Protecting Stability in Crisis
  10. 9. South Africa: Constitutional Adaptability
  11. 10. Japan: Legal Due Process
  12. Quick Reference Summary Table
  13. Debunking the Myth: Why It Isn't a "Bag of Borrowings"
  14. Exam-Oriented Quick Revision Points
  15. Frequently Asked Questions

The Master Blueprint: Government of India Act, 1935

Before looking overseas, the Constituent Assembly examined its own immediate administrative history. Nearly 60% of the Indian Constitution traces its structural and procedural DNA to the Government of India Act, 1935.

Following Partition, severe administrative upheaval, and the integration of over 500 princely states, building administrative machinery from complete scratch risked state failure. The 1935 Act provided essential institutional continuity.

GOI Act 1935 FeatureConstitutional Application in India
Federal SchemeDivision of powers between Centre and Provinces (7th Schedule baseline)
Office of the GovernorExecutive head for state administration
Judiciary InfrastructureStructural baseline for Federal Court ➔ Supreme Court of India
Public Service CommissionsBlueprint for UPSC and State PSCs (Articles 315–323)
Administrative DetailsProcedural norms maintaining civil administration continuity

1. United Kingdom: The Parliamentary Engine

Having experienced British administration for two centuries, Indian leaders chose the familiar Westminster model over a US-style presidential system to ensure executive accountability during a fragile transition.

Indian Customization: Britain has an unwritten constitution and sovereign Parliament. India established a written Constitution supreme over Parliament, with an elected President replacing the British monarch.

2. United States of America: Fundamental Rights & Judicial Defense

The US model provided the legal shield protecting individual civil liberties against state overreach:

Customization Note: US Bill of Rights was initially near-absolute. Indian framers inserted explicit "reasonable restrictions" directly into text (Article 19(2)) to balance liberty with public welfare and national security.

3. Ireland: The Social Conscience (DPSP)

Realizing civil rights alone could not eradicate deep post-colonial poverty, the Assembly adopted Ireland's framework for economic democracy:

4. Canada: Quasi-Federalism with a Strong Centre

To guard against post-Partition territorial fragmentation, India rejected traditional US-style state sovereignty in favor of Canada's centralized federation (described by K.C. Wheare as Quasi-Federal):

5. Australia: Cooperative Federalism & Free Trade

6. France: The Ideals of a Democratic Republic

7. USSR (Now Russia): Civic Duty & Economic Planning

8. Weimar Germany: Protecting Stability in Crisis

Critical Safeguard: Following Emergency lessons (1975-77), the 44th Amendment Act (1978) enacted that Articles 20 and 21 can NEVER be suspended, even during a National Emergency.

9. South Africa: Constitutional Adaptability

10. Japan: Legal Due Process

Evolutionary Note: In Maneka Gandhi Case (1978), the Supreme Court expanded Article 21 to incorporate the American principle of "Due Process of Law" (laws must also be fair, just, and reasonable).

Quick Reference Summary Table

Country / SourceBorrowed Key ProvisionsPrimary Significance
GOI Act, 1935Federal scheme, Office of Governor, Judiciary, PSCsAdministrative bedrock & continuity
United KingdomParliamentary system, Rule of Law, Single citizenship, WritsExecutive accountability & legislative framework
United StatesFundamental Rights, Judicial Review, Independent JudiciaryCivil liberties & judicial safeguards
IrelandDirective Principles (DPSP), Presidential election methodSocio-economic welfare framework
CanadaStrong Centre federation, Residuary powers, State GovernorsNational unity & structural stability
AustraliaConcurrent List, Interstate trade, Joint Parliamentary SittingInter-state cooperation & deadlock resolution
FranceRepublic, Preamble ideals: Liberty, Equality, FraternityDemocratic baseline & philosophical vision
USSR (Russia)Fundamental Duties (Art 51A), Socio-economic justiceCivic responsibility & equitable growth
Weimar GermanySuspension of Fundamental Rights during National EmergencyEmergency management & national security
South AfricaAmendment Procedure (Art 368), Rajya Sabha electionsConstitutional adaptability
JapanProcedure Established by Law (Article 21)Legal procedural safeguards for liberty

Debunking the Myth: Why It Isn't a "Bag of Borrowings"

When critics accused the Assembly of unoriginality, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar responded decisively:

"As to the accusation that the Draft Constitution has reproduced a good part of the provisions of the Government of India Act, 1935, I make no apologies. There is nothing to be ashamed of in borrowing. It involves no plagiarism. Nobody holds any patent rights in the fundamental ideas of a Constitution." — Dr. B.R. Ambedkar

GLOBAL IDEAS + INDIAN CONTEXT = LIVING DYNAMIC DOCUMENT

Exam-Oriented Quick Revision Points

Frequently Asked Questions

What percentage of the Indian Constitution is derived from the Government of India Act, 1935?

Nearly 60% of the Indian Constitution traces its administrative DNA to the Government of India Act, 1935, including the federal scheme, office of Governor, judiciary infrastructure, Public Service Commissions, and administrative procedural details.

What provisions were borrowed from the United Kingdom (UK)?

The British model provided the Parliamentary form of government, Rule of Law (Article 14), Single Citizenship, Cabinet system, Prime Minister's office, Bicameralism (Lok Sabha & Rajya Sabha), Speaker's office, and Prerogative Writs.

What key features were borrowed from the United States (USA)?

From the US, India borrowed Fundamental Rights (Part III), Judicial Review, Independence of the Judiciary, the Preamble concept ('We the People'), Impeachment of President and removal of judges, and the Vice-President post as Upper House Chair.

What is the difference between how India adapted US Fundamental Rights vs the original US Bill of Rights?

While US rights were initially near-absolute, Indian framers inserted explicit 'reasonable restrictions' directly into the text (e.g. Article 19(2)) to balance individual liberty with public order, state security, and social welfare.

What features were borrowed from Ireland?

From Ireland, India borrowed the Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP, Part IV), the Electoral College method for Presidential Elections, and the nomination of 12 members to the Rajya Sabha for expertise in art, literature, science, and social service.

Why did India adopt Canada's centralized federal model over America's model?

Following Partition and internal instability, a traditional US-style federation with strong state sovereignty posed fragmentation risks. India chose Canada's quasi-federal model with a strong Centre, vesting residuary powers in the Union (Article 248).

How did the 44th Amendment Act (1978) safeguard fundamental rights during emergencies borrowed from Weimar Germany?

While Article 359 allows suspension of fundamental rights during national emergency (borrowed from Weimar Germany), the 44th Amendment Act 1978 established that Article 20 (protection against conviction) and Article 21 (right to life and personal liberty) can NEVER be suspended.

What did Dr. B.R. Ambedkar say in response to the 'bag of borrowings' critique?

Dr. Ambedkar stated: 'There is nothing to be ashamed of in borrowing. It involves no plagiarism. Nobody holds any patent rights in the fundamental ideas of a Constitution.' The Assembly synthesized global ideas with Indian socio-economic realities.

Indian Constitution Series

Preamble, articles, rights and amendments — stay inside the constitutional-law cluster.

Lock the Provisions

Lock the provisions from this chapter with previous-year polity questions, then revise from the Indian polity notes.

Solve PYQs → Study Notes →
🌐 Language